How well do the CMIP6 models simulate dust aerosols?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract. Mineral dust impacts key processes in the Earth system, including radiation budget, clouds, and nutrient cycles. We evaluate aerosols 16 models participating sixth phase of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) against multiple reanalyses observations. note that both observations used here have their limitations particularly emission deposition are poorly constrained. Most models, multi-model ensemble mean (MEM), capture spatial patterns seasonal cycles global well. However, large uncertainties inter-model diversity found. For example, emissions, primarily driven by model-simulated surface winds, vary a factor 5 across while MEM estimate is double amount reanalyses. The ranges CMIP6 emission, deposition, burden, optical depth (DOD) larger than previous generations models. Models present considerable disagreement over North China America. Here, DOD values overestimated most with 1.2–1.7 times compared to satellite reanalysis datasets. Such overestimates can reach up individual also fail reproduce some features regional distribution, such as accumulation along southern edge Himalayas. Overall, there still models' simulated processes, which feature inconsistent biases throughout life cycle between relationship connecting mass DOD. Our results imply modelled becoming more uncertain become sophisticated. More detailed output size-resolved variables particular, relating future intercomparison projects, needed enable better constraints potential identification observationally constrained links properties.
منابع مشابه
How Well Do the CMIP5 Models Simulate the Antarctic Atmospheric Energy Budget?
The authors evaluate 23 coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5) in terms of their ability to simulate the observed climatological mean energy budget of theAntarctic atmosphere. While the models are shown to capture the gross features of the energy budget well [e.g., the observed two-way balance between the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) net radiation and horizo...
متن کاملHow well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models
متن کامل
AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6
The Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP) is endorsed by the Coupled-Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) and is designed to quantify the climate and air quality impacts of aerosols and chemically reactive gases. These are specifically near-term climate forcers (NTCFs: methane, tropospheric ozone and aerosols, and their precursors), nitrous oxide and ozonedepleting hal...
متن کاملHow Well Do High Resolution Models Represent Tropical Convection?
Cascade is a multi-institution project studying the temporal and spatial organization of tropical convective systems. While cloud resolving numerical models can reproduce the observed diurnal cycle of such systems they are sensitive to the chosen resolution. As part of this effort, we are comparing results from the Met. Office Unified Model to data from the Global Earth Radiation Budget satelli...
متن کاملHow Well Do Doodle Polls Do?
Web-based Doodle polls, where respondents indicate their availability for a collection of times provided by the poll initiator, are an increasingly common way of selecting a time for an event or meeting. Yet group dynamics can markedly influence an individual’s response, and thus the overall solution quality. Via theoretical worst-case analysis, we analyze certain common behaviors of Doodle pol...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1680-7316', '1680-7324']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2095-2022